|
Political analysts argue that the second
intifada is now over thanks to the Palestinian fear that a war on Iraq
would divert world attention from any possible atrocities that the Israelis
might want to inflict on them during a potential war in the region.
Palestinians have considered
several scenarios of what would be the Israeli reaction to any escalation
in resistance during regional turbulance. Analysts here say that the Palestinian
leadership saw it inevitable that the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
would fall heavily on the Palestinians and step up his offensive that
might lead to transferring Palestinians from the occupied territories
to the neigboring countries.
Therefore, analysts here
believe that the Palestinian leadership has opted for the most low profile
solution: Restoring the pre-intifada status quo between Palestinians and
the Israelis.
Palestinians took this
decision after Israel succeeded, to an extent, in making of the aging
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, irrelevant and has replaced his with
younger leadership whose power has been on the rise for the past months.
Hani al-Hassan, whom Arafat appointed Internal Security Miniter last October,
seems to be winning extra power and momentum. Al-Hassan, has overtly called
for the end of the intifada saying that if war happens, the Israeli reaction
to the intifada might be harsh and unpredictable while no Arab nation
would be able to the rescue of Palestinian amid a regional war.
During an interview on
Future Television a few weeks ago, al-Hasan told Abdel-Rahman Rashed the
Editor-in-Chief of the London-based Asharq al-Awsat newspaper, that Palestinians
should now seriously think of drafting a constitution for their state,
which has been authenticated by recent Security Council resolutions, and
should work hard to appoint a prime minister thus producing a system similar
to that of France.
Al-Hasan, for a greater
part of the interview, echoed Israeli demands that the Palestinian leadership
appoints a premier, drafts a constitution and runs administrative reform.
Al-Hasan, who has been
holding several meetings with the Israelis in order to rearm the Palestinian
police and retake security control of several Palestinian cities in the
West Bank.
Even though al-Hasan is
an appointed minister, he seems to be independent in his decision-making
from Arafat and the PLO.
In the al-Ayyam daily newsppaer
published here, the third page always reports on Arafat's daily activities
including his receptions. Of these never-ending number of meetings, al-Hassan's
name does not feature often among the names of Arafat's visitors.
Al-Hassan has succeeded
in supressing the different faction of Fatah's Tanzim and has stopped
military action against the Israelis. The last Fatah offensive against
the Israeli was carried in early January. Hamas, that bombed a bus in
Haifa by the beginning of this month in which 15 people were killed, seems
to be battling the leadership and the Israelis.
Eventhough no faction claimed
responsibility for the bombing, the Israeli Army attacked the Gaza strip
where Hamas is dominant.
But Analysts also say that
Hamas has shown readiness to stop attacks during the all-factions meeting
in Cairo in January.
Yet Hamas is trying to
achieve domestic presence by not stopping military action inside the 1948
territories.
Other than Hamas zeal,
most factions look settled toward running reform and going to the Quartet
(US, UN, EU and Russie) table for negotiating a new Oslo.
|