|
Professor plagiarism threatens
academic integrity
Teachers after students prepared to
steal material and claim copyright
AMMAN - Alternative staff
November 2003
Despite the strict rules private universities in the region
try to enforce to protect intellectual property, the number
and ways of violations are rapidly increasing.
In any exam, academic or non academic, several people tend
to cheat. The tendency increases when the reputation of the
person being tested is in question.
As a student you might lose an academic year, a scholarship
or even acceptance for graduate studies if you do not get a
specific grade in a course. To avoid this academic loss, the
easiest way out might seem: Cheating or plagiarism.
In both cases, a person tries to solve his/her problem by
claiming the ideas or work of others.
Students end up cheating in their exams, or using the
internet search for a little copy/paste to do a research or
even a thesis, or even to buy some projects or papers.
University students can get a paper for $100 at most and a
computer project for up to $1,000.
Four students from a prestigious private university in
Lebanon who took the same course together reported that they
bought a full computer course project.
Three of them from a software development company for $800,
and one from the instructor assistant for $650, just because
“the project was too hard to be done, and was worth 35 percent
of the course grade. It was also a required course for
graduation.”
Interestingly, according to a survey conducted earlier this
year about different aspects of academic integrity, some 300
communications students at
California
State
University
were very clear about practices that constitute breaches of
academic integrity.
Ninety percent of students surveyed answered that cheating
on tests is a breach of academic integrity while 80 percent
said that using somebody else's text was also a breach of
integrity.
However, most of these students said they cheated at some
point of their university lives.
For such cases, the
United
States and European countries have devised two main strategies
namely prevention and detection.
Instructors were encouraged to provide students with
presentations about academic integrity, educating their
students on how to research and how to cite their references.
They were also told to impose some strict regulations for the
exams that might vary from placing many exam versions to
prohibiting the use of SMS and cameras of cell phones, and to
strictly implement the rules written on such violations.
As for detection, the same way search engines are used to
help in cheating and plagiarism; a new market is now growing
for plagiarism and cheating detection software.
Using the search engine techniques, such software searches
the World Wide Web looking for similarities in a given paper
or project, and reports back to the instructor about the
section(s) that were used from other authors, with references
to the original text.
Another detection strategy is to create a central database
in the teachers’ university where they can share all the
papers and projects submitted and can use a software that can
track the similarities and differences between the papers or
projects.
But just like students do, instructors themselves sometimes
steal research martial or courses from instructors in other
institutions, most of the time in a very primitive way
mistakenly leaving the name of the author or the name of the
course on the handouts that they claim that had authored.
Along these lines, a university student in
Lebanon
reported that she blackmailed her instructor because she
figured out the source from where he copies his exams and
course material to which he previously claimed ownership for
three years.
Another way of professor cheating is when some instructors
claim credit for projects initially done by their students.
Alternative interviewed students who reported that their
project websites or their final project was sold for business
companies. A student once read about his instructor's
publications only to discover that the ideas were taken from
his (the student’s) thesis.
|