|
Lebanese labor
failure
BEIRUT - Alternative staff
November 2003
Lebanon by far enjoys the most democratic system among Arab
countries when it comes to freedom of expression and assembly.
In
the only country where an opposition demonstration can legally
go out to the streets, and amid a deteriorating socioeconomic
situation and a debt-ridden economy, merely 3,000 Lebanese
demonstrators marched from the Barbir to the Mathaf area in
Beirut to protest their government’s fiscal policies.
The low turnout was not surprising to several observers,
however. “Workers, civil servants and students usually
comprise the crust of protests,” said Youssef Haidar, a
retired civil servant and labor union figure.
“Today, however, authorities succeeded in making students and
workers distrust their leaderships,” he added.
According to Haidar, a series of practices showed that the
labor and student leaderships only protested upon the
instigation of the political factions already represented in
the Cabinet and Parliament.
“Last year, the government introduced several tax hikes on
salaries and retirements of employees in the public sector,”
he said. “But the General Labor Confederation (GLC) refused to
participate in anti-government protests leaving teachers in
the streets alone.”
In
2002, teachers’ protests succeeded in scrapping items from the
2003 state budget that introduced tax increases.
A
year later, the government proposed a budget without any
increase in taxes. “The GLC suddenly decided to escalate its
opposition.”
Maroun Qahwaji, a labor activist, told Alternative that when
the GLC leadership’s behavior is incomprehensible, people
would doubt the true intentions behind their opposition.
“In this year’s case, no one believed that the GLC was acting
to protest the interest of workers, but was rather working
upon the instigation of some politicians in a bid to settle
some political scores,” according to Qahwaji.
“That’s why the labor and student movements in the only
democratic Arab country are fading away, and there is no light
at the end of the tunnel indicating that they would be revived
sometime soon,” said Qahwaji.
The participation of several parties aggravated the already
low turnout. The participation of the Lebanese Communist Party
(LCP), for instance, was not enough to motivate several
leftists who, in a news conference, described the protest as
“a political maneuver.”
The several communist participants, holding their flags, did
not mean that the leftist movement participated.
“The LCP leadership does not represent leftists anyway. It
represents its own will and listens only to the orders it
receives from the countries authorities,” said one of the
leftists who attended the new conference opposed to the
opposition protest.
“This is what we always meant that the Lebanese democracy was
never true democracy. It was tribalism hidden behind a failing
political life and a consequent failure in student, labor and
other workers’ movements,” she added.
“We still have a long way of struggle to go,” the leftist
female activist argued.
|