|
Arabs peacefully “lobbying” in the US
by Nael
Alameh
December 2003
OHIO - “I see Israel, and never mind saying it,
as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a
marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be
transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace
for
Israel means security and that security must be a reality”.
This was the half-page advertisement
circulating with The Lantern, the daily student newspaper at
the Ohio State University OSU. It was quoting Luther King, Jr.
stating his views on
Israel and its wars against the Arabs.
The ad then asks a question: Why?
I found the question quite in place, although
to me it came from a different perspective. Why would one of
the leaders of the American civil rights movement, who once
said that “those of us who believe in non violence can be
voices of reason, sanity and understanding amid the voices of
violence, hatred and emotion, we can very well set a mood of
peace out of which a system of peace can be built”.
Why would he consider
Israel the oasis of democracy and brotherhood? The address
King made was one month before his assassination took place,
shortly after the 1967 Six-Day War, which was the final blow
to pan-Arabism.
But then came the answer: Why not? What has
changed since King’s days till today? Nothing, I believe.
Nothing at all.
“At least nothing improved,” one might argue.
One might safely assume, on the contrary, that things have
worsened for the Arabs.
The 60,000 students and the 6,000 faculty
members of OSU reading The Lantern will now respond more
eagerly to the free trips offered to visit our neighbour in
the south: “The Holy Land of Beauty and Peace, the victim of
Arab barbarism,” as the Israel Action Committee (IAC) puts it
in the flyers it circulates almost on a daily basis.
The OSU community will not think of the
Palestinian children starving to death, unemployment, the
refugees’ right of return, peace and a permanent settlement.
Americans are the last to be blamed for their
ignorance. You can not blame a society that has been built on
mere propaganda for not pursuing the truth. It is shameful
that this is how Americans deal with such issues, yet what is
more pathetic is this lack of activism among Arab students.
There are no governments suppressing activism
here and no dictatorships.
All the talk about anti-Arabs seems trivial and
naïve. It is surely a good way to put one’s conscience to
rest, but I doubt anyone has tried to take a serious action.
The only “action” my Arab friends and
colleagues have sponsored here was the watching Rambo movies.
In this part of the world, where democracy and
freedom is the ruling force (should I say relative democracy
and freedom, isn’t it always the case?), the Arab youth here
is still trying to heal from the overdose of freedom they have
been “forced” to accept and deal with.
An Arab Action Committee, for the time being,
is nothing but a joke right now.
As they wait for the next American human rights
activists to propagate their cause, the politician to oppose
George W. Bush and his administration, and perhaps the next
“historical” leader who will consider
Israel
“the symbol of equality and justice which should be further
protected,” I leave you in “peace” until Arabs decide to do
some action.
Nael Alameh is a graduate student working for
his PhD in Biology at the Ohio State University, the United
States. He wrote this analysis for Alternative
|