|
September 1, 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial
Let's Amend
the Lebanese Constitution
The
writers of these lines do not endorse constitutional
amendment per se. But when it comes to Lebanese
presidential elections, it has become evident that a
serious flow undermines this already complicated
process, which whenever takes place, drives the
nation to the verge of a civil war.
First, a simple statement should be added to the
text of the constitution. It should read as follows:
“Quorum for the election of the president of the
republic in Parliament shall be two-thirds on the
first session. Should Parliament fail to obtain such
quorum in its first session, it shall hold a second
session after 48 hours and the quorum shall consist
of members present.”
Second, the Lebanese constitution should state with
clarity that in cases, except for those of
constitutional amendment, majority at any time is
considered as a simple majority (half plus one).
Lebanese politicians should refrain from
interpreting the constitution according to their
agendas. For instance, the constitution defines six
conditions under which a cabinet is considered
dissolved. None of these conditions took place and
still President Emile Lahoud and his buddies form
among the cronies of the Syrian regime in Lebanon
invented their own interpretation to consider it out
of line of the “national convention.”
At
this point of constitutional heretics, we ask Mr.
Lahoud and his buddies when they say that the
Christians are not represented in the executive
branch of government: Does Mr. Lahoud consider his
post to be part of the executive branch or not? Does
he consider himself to be a Christian or not?
Answers to both questions are an astounding yes and
Lahoud should give up his “smart” interpretations.
National constitutions around the world were drafted
to make it easy for states to run their affairs. A
constitution is not a puzzle that should be decoded
everyday to figure out its meanings. It should not
contain items that would obstruct the holding of
parliamentary sessions because the Parliament
represents the people and whenever it is not in
session, it means that the nation is unable to rule
itself.
|